For four years in the mid-1970s he paid sporadic visits to Fighter’s Heaven
August 10, 2010 by admin
Filed under Entertainment
For four years, in the mid-1970s, he paid sporadic visits to Fighter’s Heaven, the Pennsylvanian retreat where Ali trained, while in New York he worked for Warhol’s Interview magazine. BIOGRAPHER Victor Bockris has been Britain’s front-row observer of American celebrity for 25 years. She and Alanis Morrisette must have been raised on the same baby food.So you’re not a poet? No matter. If you rap, play an instrument or sing, you too are fair game, so long as your material is original.
But if, like me, you’d rather undergo a spot of water torture, be sure to go along for the laugh. As Jude The Observer did, indeed, observe of his rival poets on Monday night, “my soul has been fed tonight”.The 5th Annual London Slam Championships will take place on March 28 and 29 at the Post Office Theatre, Hewer Street, W10. Slam Showdown is 8.30-11pm Mondays at Babushka’s, Tavistock Crescent, W11.. With her sing-song voice Helms puts the “performance” into performancepoetry. Using repetition, rhythm and astonishing truthfulness, she bewitches her audience with stories about violent relationships or the nature of nightmares Far too much wisdom for 20. Enter the unbearably young genius from Alberquerque, Amy Helms. Audiences are getting bigger and rowdier, though they’re still too polite to boo the no-good acts off stage,” he said.Now, visiting established American slammers contact him when they’re in town, so that they can appear in his gigs.
First prize went to Sally Smithson and her own ode to addiction, at least in preference to a man:”An addiction is stable.You know where you areWith a fix or a jointOr a choc-o-late bar.”But by now the scorers were vying for first place in the generosity stakes and had stopped listening to the poems long ago Slam Master in London is John Paul O’Neill. On hearing about slam’s popularity in the US, he set up the first Annual Slam Championships in 1994 and filled the Chats Palace Arts Centre in Hackney with 17 competing teams of poets and a theatre full of spectators. Since then he’s toured the world with his gig and even won slam awards for his own entries right across the US.O’Neill reels his performers in with promises of prizes, which consist of an assortment of literary must-haves, like a manual on how to grow your own strawberries and a pop-up dinosaur book.”Finally slamming is starting to take off in Britain. The experts with the scorecards are picked at random from the audience so if you’re taking the plunge bring a lot of friends.Francesca Beard set off the proceedings at Babushka’s on Monday night, the new regular slot for slammers, with the spine-tingling “Rehabilitation”, a lament to a friend who used to be wittily, if narcotically, inspired until he underwent: “.. sardonic irrigation … All your bitterness was washed away with rehabilitation.”Beard suffered from what’s known in the trade as “first person point drift”, that is to say, sober voting.She was easily the best but didn’t win. Sitting round tables in a candle-lit room listening to the bearded Bob Cobbing growl and holler while his partner punctuates the sounds with his own brand of music involving a mutilated guitar, a bow and a deeply concentrated expression, one feels transported back in time to a Bohemian London of the Sixties. Anything goes here and the variety of material on offer would make a seamstress blush.
The focal point of the evening is a competition in which anyone and everyone is encouraged to step up on to the stage, blow the dust off rhymes penned during their adolescence and offer their souls up for judgment.
Forget quizzes and one act plays about waiting for the gas man to arrive, quite the latest use for the upstairs room in a pub is for a slam. Indeed, slamming is positively storming across London, though for the lack of reverberating doors you’d be forgiven for not having noticed For slamming is about performance poetry. Had a director other than Lyne been responsible for the latest adaptation it might not have ended awash in erotic soft focus. Rather it might have conveyed something starker and dirtier and the moral punchline of the book might not have been lost. Had that happened it might have been rather easier to resist the arguments that the film should now be banned.Banned FilmsIsland of Lost Souls (1932) The horror is more intellectual than graphic in this Charles Lawton film in which a perverse doctor carries out evolutionary experiments.The Wild One (1953) Marlon Brando starred in this tale about juvenile delinquents who overtake a small town which was initially banned in Britain.A Clockwork Orange (1971) The film version of the classic exploring the freedom to use violence as a means for self expression was withdrawn by the director, Stanley Kubrick.Last House on the Left (1972) A story of rape and revenge thought too explicit was banned on video.Visions of Ecstacy Depicting the life of Christ this film was banned because of its blood imagery and the associations with sadomasochism.Reservoir Dogs (1991) A whole year elapsed before this film, criticised for its violence, was released on video.The Good Son (1993) Home Alone star Macauley Culkin plays psychotic Henry in this thriller, withdrawn shortly after the murder of James Bulger.Natural Born Killers (1994) This controversial Oliver Stone film which follows two low-lives on a killing spree was not given a certificate.. “It handled its subject responsibly by showing the relationship as both wrong and disastrous,” saidthe new film censor, Andreas Whittam Smith this week, justifying his decision not to ban the film after taking the advice of two child psychiatrists that the movie was unlikely to create new paedophiles.But we are concerned not with corruption so much as legitimisation.
After the film is over, what lingers in the minds of its audience – the moral catastrophe or the indulgent sensuality? The reservations then are as much artistic as moral. And indeed the ending is as moral as any majoritarian might want. Humbert goes mad, murders another paedophile, goes to prison and dies, while Lolita ends life a pauper in a shack who dies in childbirth. His moral justification is that the film lures the viewer into identifying with Humbert, and then shows the consequences of the acts and the damage they do.